Relatives' Heartache Regarding Shoreline Erosion Threatening Coastal Norfolk Burial Sites
Families whose relatives laid to rest in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat argue that indecision on how best to tackle the problem is creating avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.
An Impending Threat to Historic Churchyards
The council have singled out three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being engulfed by the ocean in the next few generations.
A recent report on the issue details a series of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer sites. Authorities say it is for local people to determine how to move forward.
“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”
Estimates indicate at least a portion of one graveyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.
Troubled by the Past
One resident remembered a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.
“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go grave robbing in search of valuables. That is completely undignified.”
“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I’d be disgusted by that.”
A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Peril
Further up the coast lies the grave of a ex-soldier killed while working abroad. His mother expressed she could not sleep after discovering her son’s final plot might one day be moved.
“It truly disturb me to consider this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”
In her view, new burials should stop but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a tipping point has been reached.”
Seeking Answers and Clarity
An absence of consensus over the timing and method to handle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and anxious.
Several families want more sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to continue for now. Others contend the moment for relocation is approaching.
“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”
A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is up to them to decide the direction to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with communities.”
He added there was ample time to consider all the choices. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”
“There is no common view on what should be done yet. We need good local conversations to discover the appropriate answers for each village.”
The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, providing a spiritual perspective on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.