🔗 Share this article

We are in Black History Month in the Britain, and it feels like it’s time for a reassessment. Over the years, an event that was initiated as a festivity and recollection of history, culture and the connections between global Black communities, has taken on a corporate feel, broadening to incorporate events where individuals of African heritage are paid to talk to predominantly white listeners about hidden biases and active solidarity. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade generated a rise in the industry of showcasing anti-racist commitment. But even that moment has passed. The tide has peaked, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what promoting consciousness is for.

The Origins of Black History Observance

Originally observed in the America and its northern neighbor, Black History Month was created in 1962 as an observance of African American heritage by Black scholar Carter G. Woodson with a week of commemoration and observance in the second week of February. Black History Month evolved from this campaign and was formally inaugurated in 1970. Currently it is marked not only in the North America in February, but also in the tenth month in the UK, Germany, Éire and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The period has evolved since its inception, placing less emphasis on the narratives of transatlantic enslavement and struggles for equality, and more on influential individuals of color in government, the arts, and social movements, and extensively acknowledging the impact Black people have made to mold society. It is in educational institutions where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with talks and cultural events. But the way the month is observed is a indication of the political moment. How it evolves is a instructive case in how co-option leads to dismantling: the transformation of Black History Month has impeded the purpose of it, which is to tackle embedded and established prejudice.

---

A Jarring Moment

Few things illustrate how crucial it is to reevaluate Black History Month better than the particular moment in which it occurs this year. In the United Kingdom, a revitalized conservative movement in the guise of the Reform party is top in opinion ratings. In the recent season we observed the biggest extreme right demonstration in the UK's past. the Conservative leader, the African descendant in charge of the Tory party, is a staunch adversary of Black Lives Matter, and we are in a place where a member of parliament gains confidence to declare that a lack of white people in specific city neighborhoods is a source of worry. At the same time, ultra-nationalist movements are expanding in Europe as a complete entity.

In the America, a colossal assault against DEI and affirmative action has been taken, often successfully, to the supreme judicial bodies of the country. A campaign to scrub the history of people of color and experience from the archives is in progress. One of the political figure's first executive orders aimed at the institution dedicated to Black heritage, and the prestigious establishment, accusing them of a “concerted and widespread effort to change the national past” by depicting the United States “as inherently racist”.

In this context, the celebration represents how insufficiently it can be effective if it is restricted to either obligatory business commemorations, or stripped of political content commemorations of historical achievements, rather than addressing the situation of the present. It also reveals how its short period means that it is detached from the wider consistent effort that is necessary. Denise Miller, a prof at University of Greenwich, put it best when she expressed apprehension about the temporary “tokenism” of the month. “The issue with taking a tokenistic approach”, she stated, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month becomes a brief show rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Rethinking, But Not Jettisoning

Figuring out how to alter, change and broaden initiatives for fair treatment and appreciation in such periods of dismay and anxiety is a treacherous thing. There is a temptation to just eliminate events including Black History Month entirely, thinking they are simply not fit for purpose, or are remnants of an time that has failed to deliver.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the whole broad system and heritage of activism for racial justice – local anti-racism groups, inclusion and equity efforts, and indeed, including corporate presentations – constitute an foundation that a significant effort has gone into. It is there not just to decay as the politics moves on (and in fact, regresses), but to be a vital organism.

So what would a fresh vibrant Black History Month look like? Firstly, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is distributed across all seasons (as various establishments are already beginning to do), parts of its content (particularly around notable African descendants) integrated into educational programs. It would also be a period that does not shy away from political issues, and leaves space for individuals, particularly youth, to air their fears and experiences. What value has mere awareness of the history when it fails to address the present reality of extreme conservative demonstrations in the urban areas? Institutions who celebrate it should not be pacified with the neutral terminology of implicit prejudice and awareness of subtle slights, but challenged by the threats that face all if anti-racism is not approached earnestly. In short, Black History Month should be made up-to-date, critical, and reactive. It could be that an complete renaming is necessary – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.